ScienceDaily (Jan. 20, 2011) — The forecast for predicting the next political hotspots could be much more accurate because of a model developed by two Kansas State University professors and a colleague in New York.
The model, named the Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast, is currently five for five in predicting which countries will likely experience an escalation in domestic political violence against their governments within the next five years.
"So far it’s been pretty accurate," said Sam Bell, assistant professor of political science at K-State. Bell created the forecast model with Amanda Murdie, K-State assistant professor of political science, and David Cingranelli, professor of political science at Binghamton University, Binghamton, N.Y. It was developed for Milcord, an Open Innovation company that builds knowledge management solutions for federal agencies.
To date the model has successfully predicted civil unrest in Peru, Ireland, Ecuador, Italy and most recently, Tunisia. Iran is currently at the top of the list.
"What’s interesting is that while our model predicts violence in countries like Honduras and Iran, it’s also predicting it in western democracies," Murdie said. "For example, our model predicted violence in Ireland. That happened recently due to the International Monetary Fund bailout."
To create the forecast model, the researchers built a database using publicly available information on 150 countries. It contains the frequency and intensity of domestic political violence from 1990-2009. According to Bell, this violence includes anything from a sit-in that turns into a physical altercation to an embassy bombing.
Although other forecast models have been created, this is one of the most encompassing, Murdie said. It accounts for factors like repression, governmental aid to nongovernmental organizations, aid to countries to help build security, and Internet and mobile phone usage.
In order to forecast domestic political violence, three concepts are accounted for: coercion, coordination and capacity.
Coercion is defined by violations of physical rights. This heightens the motivation of protestors, according to Murdie.
"I think that was one of the biggest findings from our model: that adhering to basic human rights limits the political violence," she said. "In covering all these countries and in looking at this passage of time, we find that human rights crackdowns still hurt a country the most, even to this day.
"There’s this tendency for government to be reactionary and crack down on political rights in order to suppress political violence, but we find that crackdowns lead to this mobilization effect where people take to the streets," she said. "The human rights crackdowns don’t stop insurgency; they help fuel it."
The second concept, coordination, is how easily a domestic group can mobilize.
"Two summers ago in Iran we really saw the YouTube and Twitter effect in regard to a population’s ability to coordinate and increase the level of violence," Murdie said. This mobile coordination can either quickly diffuse or escalate the level of violence.
Capacity, the third factor, is the ability of a country to project itself throughout its territory, thus limiting the intensity of domestic violence against government.
Although the current model operates at a macro level, Bell said it’s possible to isolate certain countries and aggregate a much smaller time frame from the current five-year forecast. The researchers have also thought about using the database to create a risk assessment for civilian terrorism against other citizens.
The Domestic Political Violence Forecasting Model has been developed under the Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism project sponsored by the Air Force Research Labs Rome Research Laboratory. A list of the top 37 countries projected to experience civil unrest between now and 2014 and updates on forecast accuracy can be found online at http://radicalism.milcord.com/blog.
source : Science Daily
Here is our model’s forecast for 2010 – 2014 as a ranked list:
- Iran
- Sri Lanka
- Russia
- Georgia
- Israel
- Turkey
- Burundi
- Chad
- Honduras
- Czech Republic
- China
- Italy
- Colombia
- Ukraine
- Indonesia
- Malaysia
- Jordan
- Mexico
- Kenya
- South Africa
- Ireland
- Peru
- Chile
- Armenia
- Tunisia
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Belarus
- Argentina
- Albania
- Ecuador
- Sudan
- Austria
- Nigeria
- Syria
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Egypt
- Belgium
Popularity: 35% [?]
[...] Predicting Political Hotspots: Professors’ Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrest Against Governments [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marc Parent, John Jones, murray regan, ChurchAndState, Khaled Hishma and others. Khaled Hishma said: RT @mparent77772: Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrest Against Governments http://bit.ly/eplV0n [...]
[...] Predicting Political Hotspots: Professors’ Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrest Against Governments [...]
There hasn’t been civil unrest in Ireland, only some political instability and an economic crisis. But these are not the same thing as civil unrest. Civil unrest is what happened in Tunisia and Egypt recently. This simply hasn’t happened in Ireland, nor would it.
The author’s study describes civil unrest as violence against the government, so it doesn’t necessarily mean it needs to be the degree of Egypt to satisfy a “hit” according to their model.
It’s an important distinction i give you. Take China, the model is predicting violence against the government, but that could mean anything from protest, to Tienanmen Square, all the way to a regime change.
[...] Iran is the most likely to experience violence against the government in the next 4 years according to the Milcord Model [...]
[...] Predicting Political Hotspots : Professor’s Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrests Against Gover… [...]
[...] At Davos, nearly 50% saw economic problems ahead for China, but just 1% saw political. I’m among the 1% and in fact there is closer to an 80% chance for escalating violence against the government according the Predictive Societal Indicators of Domestic Violence Forecast model. [...]
[...] and Confucius, used to poor conditions, so no risk of social unrest, despite what some models suggest, echoing what Charles Y.S Liu said on another Milken [...]
[...] Predicting Political Hotspots: Professors’ Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrest Against Governments AKPC_IDS += "1989,";Popularity: unranked [?] [...]
[...] Not to mention, bailing out non government institutions is a factor in one model that predicts social unrest. [...]
[...] have on the banking industry and little on the political ramifications. I’ve posted how one study pegs China’s government as the 11th most likely to suffer from violence by it’s pe… I’ve also mentioned how the military is made up mostly of the poor, whose families have not [...]
[...] government bailouts of non government entities, oppression and more found in the much better model, Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast. Nevertheless, the implications are [...]
[...] is not just within companies, it’s throughout government. Meanwhile, the extent of oppression, a risk factor in uprisings, is staggering. People are being thrown off their land and forced to live in unsanitary conditions [...]
[...] with pre-conditions of oppression, sentiment among news headlines was said to forecast the Egyptian uprising. The above [...]
[...] with pre-conditions of oppression, sentiment among news headlines was said to forecast the Egyptian uprising. The above [...]
[...] with pre-conditions of oppression, sentiment among news headlines was said to forecast the Egyptian uprising. The above [...]
[...] protests should not be a surprise, given we know that bailouts of non government entities is a risk factor in violence against the governments. The US has a much lesser degree of oppression than countries at risk of a regime change, but the [...]
[...] to money printing. Both maneuvers create social unrest, as bailouts of non government entities is a risk factor in violence against governments. As a consequence of the protests, governments that have previously [...]
[...] However, the King’s health is in decline. One could argue the oppression is not as severe as in other countries at risk of an overthrow. The King is said to be loved by the Saudi people, while the rest of the royal family is resented. [...]
[...] know that bailouts of non government entities is a risk factor in violence against governments, as shown by Occupy Wall Street, so this will create more long term [...]
[...] Models show bailouts are directly related to increased social unrest, as the #OWS movement confirms, particularly when the people of those countries are struggling [...]
[...] A revolution in Iran is entirely plausible, if not likely. Insurgents nearly toppled the Iranian government just a few years ago and it remains the most likely country to experience a violent uprising according to the “Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast.” [...]
[...] professors built the Mincord model to scan for countries set up for social unrest. The model has an 80% in sample success rate of [...]
[...] professors built the Mincord model to scan for countries set up for social unrest. The model has an 80% in sample success rate of [...]
Why did the model fail to predict the unrest in Libya?
[...] second model of popular unrest is the “Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast.” It was developed by Sam Bell, with Amanda Murdie, both at Kansas State University, and David [...]
[...] “Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast” has been incredibly prescient both in sample and out of [...]
[...] Predicting Political Hotspots: Professors’ Global Model Forecasts Civil Unrest Against Government [...]
[...] jobs), and the government’s inability to effectively censor mobile communications. In the Predictive Societal Indicators of Radicalism Model of Domestic Political Violence Forecast, the ability to mobilize is one of the three primary factors that escalate the probability of [...]